DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
Ralph R. Carrieri, Mineola, N.Y., for appellants. Michael Kaszubski, P.C., Massapequa, N.Y., for respondent Julianna Santos.
Debra Bloom, Plainview, N.Y., attorney for nonparty child Jean Matthew D.
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO, J.P., THOMAS A. DICKERSON, ARIEL E. BELEN, and CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.
In a sibling visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, Alexandra D. and Natalie D. appeal from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Stack, J.H.O.), dated April 13, 2011, which, in effect, denied their petition and dismissed the proceeding for lack of standing.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the petition is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings on the petition in accordance herewith.
Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 71, a sibling may commence a proceeding to seek visitation with a whole or half sibling who is under the care, custody, and control of a parent or other person or party. Where the sibling seeking such relief is a minor, “a proper person” may seek such relief on his or her behalf (Domestic Relations Law § 71). Contrary to the Family Court's determination, the petitioners at bar, who are seeking visitation with their half brother, have standing to commence this proceeding ( id.; see State ex rel. Noonan v. Noonan, 145 Misc.2d 638, 641, 547 N.Y.S.2d 525). Moreover, the petitioners' attorney was a “proper person” to commence this proceeding on their behalf (Domestic Relations Law § 71; seeFamily Ct. Act § 241; 22 NYCRR 7.2[d][2]; Matter of Cocose v. Diane B., 8 Misc.3d 1020[A], 2005 N.Y. Slip Op. 51203[U], 2005 WL 1792599 [2005] ).
Accordingly, the Family Court erred by, in effect, denying the petition and dismissing the proceeding for lack of standing.