AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

ROBERT EARL ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. PAUL SUMNITCH and BELINDA SCHRUBBE, Defendants.

STEPHEN L. CROCKER

ORDER

On May 25, 2012, I issued an order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff Robert Alexander failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). On July 9, 2012, I issued an order denying his motion for reconsideration. Now he has submitted a letter in which he states that he since has exhausted his administrative remedies and would like to reopen his case. Dkt. 51 (attached documents show that Alexander filed complaints in August 2012, after I had closed his case).

Because exhaustion is a precondition to filing suit, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has found that it is not enough for a prisoner litigant to meet this requirement after filing his lawsuit. Dixon v. Page, 291 F.3d 485, 489 (7th Cir. 2002). Alexander may file a new complaint and pay another filing fee to initiate a new lawsuit if he wishes to do so, but the court cannot take any further action in this case.

BY THE COURT:

STEPHEN L. CROCKER


Magistrate Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Alexander v. Sumnitch
(Oct 1, 2012)