Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

United States, Appellee, v. Ronell Wilson, AKA Rated R, Defendant-Appellant.

Dennis Jacobs

At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 25 day of June , two thousand fourteen, Present: Dennis Jacobs,


Chester J. Straub,


Christopher F. Droney,


Circuit Judges.


We REMAND for the District Court to reconsider its decision that Wilson is not intellectually disabled, United States v. Wilson, 922 F. Supp. 2d 334 (E.D.N.Y. 2013), in light of Hall v. Florida, 134 S. Ct. 1986 (2014). The District Court should address whether it needs to consider evidence of Wilson's adaptive deficits given Wilson's IQ scores. The District Court may consider any other issue it deems appropriate and conduct additional factfinding if warranted.

We express no opinion regarding how, if at all, Hall affects the District Court's original analysis. This remand is pursuant to the procedure outlined in United States v. Jacobson, 15 F.3d 19, 22 (2d Cir. 1994).

Wilson's motion to stay the time to file a briefing schedule (Docket No. 39) is DENIED AS MOOT.

FOR THE COURT:


Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of Court


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Wilson
(Jun 25, 2014)