Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Robert SMITH, appellant.

Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant. Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Lauren Tan of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), dated April 12, 2012, which, after a hearing pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C, designated him a level three sex offender.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The County Court's designation of the defendant as a level three sex offender under the Sex Offender Registration Act ( see Correction Law article 6–C) was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see Correction Law article 6–C; People v. Geehreng, 101 A.D.3d 975, 955 N.Y.S.2d 530;People v. Cox, 103 A.D.3d 866, 961 N.Y.S.2d 474,lv. denied21 N.Y.3d 855, 2013 WL 1876254;People v. Dong V. Dao, 9 A.D.3d 401, 401–402, 779 N.Y.S.2d 914). The defendant's arguments to the contrary are without merit.

BALKIN, J.P., HALL, LOTT and SGROI, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Smith
(Jul 3, 2013)