PER CURIAM
UNPUBLISHED
Present: Judges Elder, Alston and Senior Judge Coleman
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.
PER CURIAM
FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF WINCHESTER
John E. Wetzel, Jr., Judge
(Todd M. Jack, pro se, on brief).
No brief for appellee.
Todd M. Jack appeals from a February 28, 2013 final order of the circuit court dismissing Jack's petition for judicial review of the Virginia Employment Commission's (VEC's) findings that he is disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits and that he is liable to repay the VEC for unemployment compensation benefits he fraudulently obtained. The VEC filed a motion to dismiss Jack's appeal to this Court for Jack's failure to comply with numerous rules of this Court, and a motion for summary disposition pursuant to Rule 5A:27.
We have reviewed the record, the opinions of the VEC deputy commissioner, the VEC appeals examiner, the VEC special examiner, and the circuit court's February 28, 2013 final order, and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the special examiner's opinions, as affirmed by the circuit court in its final order dismissing Jack's petition for judicial review of the VEC's decision. See In the matter of Jack, Comm'n Decisions 105055-C and 105056-C (Oct. 3, 2012), aff'd, Jack v. Virginia Emp't Comm'n, Case No. CL12000508-00 (Winchester Circ. Ct. Feb. 28, 2013). Appellant waived oral argument, and we summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.