AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In re Pierino ANASTASIO, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Raymond KELLY, etc., et al., Respondents–Respondents.

Jeffrey L. Goldberg, P.C., Port Washington (Jeffrey L. Goldberg of counsel) for appellant. Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Keith M. Snow of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Wooten, J.), entered May 7, 2013, which denied the petition to annul respondents' determination, dated October 14, 2010, denying petitioner's application for World Trade Center (WTC) accidental disability retirement benefits, and dismissed the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner challenges respondents' determination that he did not establish that his disabling condition, chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), is a “qualifying physical condition,” as defined by Retirement and Social Security Law § 2(36)(c)(v). Although petitioner's physicians opined that his CFS, which was diagnosed in about 2007, was related to his WTC exposure, credible evidence supports respondents' conclusion that it was causally related to two other physical conditions, mononucleosis and an acute viral infection caused by the Epstein–Barr virus, both unrelated to his WTC exposure ( see Administrative Code of City of N.Y. § 13–252.1[1][a]; Matter of Bitchatchi v. Board of Trustees of the N.Y. City Police Dept. Pension Fund, Art. II, 20 N.Y.3d 268, 958 N.Y.S.2d 680, 982 N.E.2d 600 [2012]; Matter of Quinn v. Kelly, 92 A.D.3d 589, 938 N.Y.S.2d 798 [1st Dept.2012], lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 813, 2012 WL 4936652 [2012]; see also Matter of Brennan v. Kelly, 111 A.D.3d 407, 974 N.Y.S.2d 374 [1st Dept.2013], lv. denied23 N.Y.3d 907, 2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 76669, 2014 WL 2935906 [2014] ). Furthermore, even assuming that petitioner's condition was considered a “qualifying” condition, the evidence supports the finding that his past viral infections were sufficient to rebut any presumption of causation.

We have considered petitioner's remaining arguments and find them unavailing. TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, FEINMAN, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Anastasio v. Kelly
(Oct 9, 2014)