Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

John M. FRANKLIN, Defendant Below–Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below–Appellee.

RANDY J. HOLLAND

Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, in and for Sussex County, Cr. ID 0304010407C.
Before STEELE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and BERGER, Justices.


ORDER


RANDY J. HOLLAND, Justice.


This 18th day of June 2013, after careful consideration of the parties' briefs and the record on appeal, we find it manifest that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court's well-reasoned, twenty-one page opinion dated November 7, 2012. The Superior Court did not err in concluding that appellant's third motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that appellant had failed to overcome the procedural hurdles.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Franklin v. State
(Jul 2, 2013)