Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

PEOPLE v. HURTADO.

Prior report: Cal.App., 157 Cal.Rptr.3d 315

Review is ordered on the court's own motion. Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Teal v. Superior Court, (see Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.512(d)(2)), or pending further order of the court. Submission of additional briefing, pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.520, is deferred pending further order of the court. For the purposes of briefing and oral argument, the People are deemed the petitioner in this court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.520(a)(6).) WERDEGAR, J., was absent and did not participate.


CANTIL–SAKAUYE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, CHIN, CORRIGAN and LIU, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Hurtado
(Jul 31, 2013)