AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

Jerusha CHRISTIE and Shirley Lo v. joy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Abdullah Haddad, Deceased, Plaintiffs,

JAMES D. PAGONES

Andrew L. Spitz, Esq., Finkelstein & Partners, Shirley Lovejoy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Abdullah Haddad, Newburgh, for Plaintiff. Jerusha Christie, Poughkeepsie, Plaintiff, Pro Se.
William W. Frame, Esq., Corbally, Gartland & Rappleyea, LLP, Ciboney Café, Ciboney, Inc., Valerie Peterkin, and Donald L. Peterkin Poughkeepsie, Victor Dunlop, Esq. Dunlop & Associates, P.C. Jermaine Coleman p/k/a Maino Brooklyn, for Defendant.
JAMES D. PAGONES, J.



Defendants Ciboney Café, Inc., Ciboney, Inc., Valerie Peterkin and Donald Peterkin move for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' complaint.

It is well settled that in order “to obtain summary judgment, it is necessary that the movant establish his or her cause of action or defense sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment' in his or her favor (CPLR 3212[b] ), and he or she must do so by tender of evidentiary proof in admissible form.” (Friends of Animals, Inc. v. Associated Fur Mfrs., Inc., 46 N.Y.2d 1065, 1067 [1979].) Parties opposing a motion for summary judgment are obliged to lay bare their evidentiary proof in admissible form in order to show that their allegations are capable of being established at a trial. (Albouyeh v. County of Suffolk, 96 A.D.2d 543 [2d Dept.1983] aff'd 62 N.Y.2d 681 [1984].) Bare conclusory allegations, expressions of hope or unsubstantiated assertions are insufficient. (Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562 [1980].)

The incident which forms the basis for this lawsuit occurred during the early morning hours of August 3, 2008 at Ciboney Café, located at 189 Church Street, Poughkeepsie, New York. The moving defendants were the owners and operated the subject establishment at the time.

The record indicates that defendant Valarie Peterkin entered into a contract with a promoter, Mimi Brown, for the use of the Café to host a DJ concert. The event was to begin at approximately 10:00 p.m. on August 2, 2008 and conclude at 4:00 a.m. on August 3, 2008. The DJ artists who were expected to perform were identified by the promoter in a flyer. The promotional materials did not identify defendant Jermaine Coleman p/k/a Maino as one of the performers. The record clearly indicates he was not an employee of any of the moving defendants, nor under their control or supervision.

According to Peterkin, security personnel was present throughout the concert. Sometime between 2:00 a.m. and 3:00 a.m. on August 3, 2008, Maino became involved in an altercation with a patron. The violence escalated to such a degree that the City of Poughkeepsie Police and other police agencies were required to respond to provide crowd control and additional security.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Christie v. Ciboney Café, Ciboney, Inc.
(Jul 31, 2013)