Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Jason James VOGT, Plaintiff and Appellant v. STATE of North Dakota, Defendant and Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

David N. Ogren, Grand Forks Public Defender Office, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellant.

Tristan J. Van de Streek, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Jason Vogt appeals from a district court's order denying his application for post-conviction relief. In 2015, Vogt pled guilty to one count of gross sexual imposition, a class A felony. Vogt applied for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel and seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. After an evidentiary hearing, the district court denied his application. Vogt appealed, arguing the district court erred because his attorney's conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and he was prejudiced, among other things, by his trial counsel's failure to (1) investigate the credibility of the two victims; and (2) advise him of the effect two victims would have on his risk assessment. We conclude the district court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶ 2] The judgment incorrectly designates, at paragraph four, the Honorable Norman John C. Irby. We remand for the district court to correct the judgment to accurately reflect the Honorable John C. Irby.

[¶ 3] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., LISA FAIR McEVERS, DANIEL J. CROTHERS, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Vogt v. State
(Mar 3, 2016)