Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Richard D. HURLES, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Charles L. RYAN , Respondent–Appellee.

Michael Aaron Harwin, Esquire, Law Offices of Michael A. Harwin, PC, Denise Irene Young, Denise I. Young, Tucson, AZ, for Petitioner–Appellant. Kent Ernest Cattani, Chief Counsel, Arizona Attorney General's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Respondent–Appellee.
Before: HARRY PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, and SANDRA S. IKUTA, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The warden's Motion for Ruling on Respondent–Appellees' Petition for Rehearing En Banc, filed February 1, 2013, is DENIED. The parties may file a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc with respect to the opinion filed together with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.
-------- Notes:

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Hurles v. Ryan
(May 16, 2014)