AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

DAVID EARL GORDON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN R. TIFF, et al., Defendants.

M. CASEY RODGERS

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 18, 2012 (doc. 30). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), this cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff's initiating a new cause of action accompanied by payment of the $350.00 filing fee in its entirety.

3. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

_________________


M. CASEY RODGERS


CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Gordon v. Tiff
(Apr 2, 2012)