AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MICKEY K. SUTTON, Petitioner, v. JAMES MCDONOUGH, Respondent.

M. CASEY RODGERS

ORDER

This matter is before the court on petitioner's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (doc. 48) and motion for certificate of appealability (doc. 49). For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (doc. 32) and the adopting Order (doc. 39), the court finds that petitioner fails to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and the issues are not adequate enough to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Additionally, under Fed. R. App. P. 24, the court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. Petitioner's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (doc. 48) is DENIED.
2. Petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability (doc. 49) is DENIED.


_________________


M. CASEY RODGERS


CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Sutton v. McDonough
(Apr 2, 2012)