AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Darryl GOODWIN, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan Garvin of counsel), for appellant. Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Ellen C. Abbot, and Matthew Sweet of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), rendered August 13, 2009, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention regarding the Supreme Court's Sandoval ruling *902( see People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371, 357 N.Y.S.2d 849, 314 N.E.2d 413) is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05[2] ) and, in any event, any error was harmless, as there was overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt ( see People v. Jean–Louis, 74 A.D.3d 1093, 905 N.Y.S.2d 615), and no significant probability that the error contributed to his convictions ( see People v. Crimmins, 36 N.Y.2d 230, 241–242, 367 N.Y.S.2d 213, 326 N.E.2d 787).

DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, LOTT and SGROI, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Goodwin
(May 30, 2012)