Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

COREY FORD, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH T. SMITH, NEVILLE ANDREWS, Defendants.

Thomas J. McAvoy

THOMAS J. McAVOY
Senior United States District Judge


DECISION and ORDER I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule N.D.N.Y. 72.3(c). In her January 16, 2014 Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 44), Magistrate Judge Dancks recommends that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 39) be granted and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 33) be denied as moot. No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

II. DISCUSSION

After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 39) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 33) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED

__________


Thomas J. McAvoy


Senior, U.S. District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Ford v. Smith
(Feb 19, 2014)