Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Mini–Dozer WORK, Wayne R. Richardson, Petitioners, v. LINH NGUYEN PHUNG, Respondent.

Prior report: 162 Wash.App. 1055, 2011 WL 2993078.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Owens, J.M. Johnson and Wiggins, considered at its January 4, 2012, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Respondent's motion to strike and dismiss the petition for review is denied. The Petition for Review is denied. The Respondent's request for attorney fees as a sanction is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.9(a). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), Respondent should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Work v. Phung
(Jan 4, 2012)