AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

CORNELIUS BROWN, Plaintiff, v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN SVS., TY LYNN BOUER, Facility Operating Officer, CHRIS BO SIMMONS, Assoc. Facility Officer, JOHN KROLL, Director of Nursing, LORI STRONG, Asst. Unit Super

Joseph F. Bataillon United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis ("IFP"). (Filing No. 2.) Upon review of the record in this case, the court finds that Plaintiff is financially eligible to proceed IFP, and the court will presume that Plaintiff is not a prisoner for the purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA").

The term "prisoner" under the PLRA "means any person incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, violations of criminal law or the terms and conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program." Kolocotronis v. Morgan, 247 F.3d 726, 728 (8th Cir. 2001) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h)). A person involuntarily committed as a mental patient, and not as a result of a criminal conviction, is not a "prisoner" for the purposes of the PLRA. Id. ; see also Jackson v. Johnson, 475 F.3d 261, 266 (5th Cir. 2007); Willis v. Smith, No. C04-4012-MWB, 2005 WL 550528, *9 (N.D. Iowa 2005).

The record does not disclose whether Plaintiff's current commitment to the Norfolk Regional Center arises from any criminal conviction. However, to facilitate a more expeditious resolution of this case, the court will presume that Plaintiff is residing at the Norfolk Regional Center as a patient and not as the result of a criminal conviction.

Upon review of the record, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP is granted, and Plaintiff is relieved from payment of the filing fee in this matter.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed IFP (Filing No. 2) is provisionally granted. Plaintiff is not required to pay the filing fee in this matter.

2. The Clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum and Order to the appropriate officials at the Norfolk Regional Center.

DATED this 1 day of October, 2014.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Joseph F. Bataillon


United States District Judge


*This opinion may contain hyperlinks to other documents or Web sites. The U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide on their Web sites. Likewise, the court has no agreements with any of these third parties or their Web sites. The court accepts no responsibility for the availability or functionality of any hyperlink. Thus, the fact that a hyperlink ceases to work or directs the user to some other site does not affect the opinion of the court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Brown v. Dept. of Health & Human SVS
(Oct 1, 2014)