Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Mark DZIELSKI et al., Respondents, v. ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Hurwitz & Fine, P.C., Buffalo (Dan D. Kohane of counsel), for appellant. Damon Morey LLP, Buffalo (Kathleen M. Reilly, Eric C. Naegely and Jessica M. DeMichiel of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order reversed, with costs, plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment denied, defendant's motion for summary judgment granted, and judgment granted to defendant declaring that it has no obligation to indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division (90 A.D.3d 1493, 1495–1497, 935 N.Y.S.2d 402 [2011] ).

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Dzielski v. Essex Ins. Co.
(Jun 5, 2012)