Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of Booker T. JONES, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

Booker T. Jones, Newark, New Jersey, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 22, 2011, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a security agent for the employer for over two years. While on the job, claimant became involved in a *513heated verbal exchange with a coworker that escalated into a physical altercation resulting in claimant striking the coworker and pushing him to the ground. As a result, claimant was terminated from his position. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board found that claimant was not acting in self-defense and disqualified him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. Fighting with a coworker, regardless of who initiates the confrontation, has been held to constitute misconduct disqualifying a claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits ( see Matter of Chisholm [Commissioner of Labor], 54 A.D.3d 1094, 865 N.Y.S.2d 695 [2008];Matter of McGloin [Commissioner of Labor], 9 A.D.3d 727, 728, 779 N.Y.S.2d 833 [2004] ). Here, there is no dispute that claimant engaged in such behavior while working for the employer. Therefore, substantial evidence supports the Board's decision disqualifying him from receiving benefits.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs. ROSE, J.P., LAHTINEN, KAVANAGH, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Jones
(Nov 8, 2012)