AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

HAROLD SELTZER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DUNKIN' DONUTS, Inc., et al., Defendants.

ORDER

GENE PRATTER, District Judge

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2011, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 10), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART, as follows:

1. The Motion is GRANTED with regard to Counts II, VI, X and XIV of the Complaint, which present third-party beneficiary claims on behalf of Plaintiffs AAA Development Management, AAA Development Group, AAA Yowza and Yowza Enterprises (collectively, "the Entity Plaintiffs"); and Counts IV, VIII, XII and XVI of the Complaint, which present tortious interference claims on behalf of the Entity Plaintiffs.
2. The Motion is DENIED with regard to Counts III, VII, XI and XV of the Complaint, which present promissory estoppel claims on behalf of the Entity Plaintiffs; and Counts V, IX, XIII and XVII of the Complaint, which present fraudulent misrepresentation claims on behalf of the Entity Plaintiffs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SELTZER v. DUNKIN' DONUTS, INC. (E.D.Pa. 4-21-2011)
(Apr 21, 2011)