AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Angel LOPEZ–VALENZUELA; Isaac Castro–Armenta, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. COUNTY OF MARICOPA; Joseph M. Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff, in his Official Capacity; William G. Montgomery, Maricopa County Attorney, in his Official Capacity, Defendants–Appellees.

KOZINSKI

Cecillia D. Wang, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, San Francisco, CA, Esha Bhandari, ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, New York, NY, Dan Pochoda, ACLU of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, Andre Segura, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York, NY, Kenneth J. Sugarman, Rudy, Exelrod, Zieff & Lowe, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs–Appellants. Timothy James Casey, Esquire, Litigation Counsel, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod PC, Phoenix, AZ, Anne C. Longo, Bruce P. White, Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Defendants–Appellees.
D.C. No. 2:08–cv–00660–SRB.


ORDER


KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. Judges MURGUIA and HURWITZ did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Lopez-Valenzuela v. Cnty. of Maricopa
(Jan 2, 2014)