Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by

Charles L. Wade, Plaintiff/Petitioner v. Hamilton County Prosecutor's Office, et al., Defendants/Respondents

ORDER

Sandra S. Beckwith, Senior Judge, United States District Court.

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation filed November 7, 2011 (Doc. 7).

Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). As of the date of this Order, no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.

Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, we find the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation correct.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Plaintiff's/Petitioner's complaint/petition is dismissed with prejudice.

This Court certifies that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) an appeal of this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore DENIES plaintiff/petitioner leave to appeal in forma pauperis. See Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999), overruling in part Floyd v. United States Postal Serv., 105 F.3d 274, 277 (6th Cir. 1997).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WADE v. HAMILTON CTY
(Nov 28, 2011)