Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of Da v. d H. DALTON, II, Respondent,

Congdon, Flaherty, O'Callaghan, Reid, Donlon, Travis & Fishlinger, Uniondale (Gregory A. Cascino of counsel), for appellant. Lipsitz, Greene, Scime, Cambria, LLP, Buffalo (John A. Collins of counsel), for respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. The courts below did not abuse their discretion in granting claimant's application to file and serve a late notice of claim ( see Williams v. Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 N.Y.3d 531, 814 N.Y.S.2d 580, 847 N.E.2d 1154 [2006] ).

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT, RIVERA and ABDUS–SALAAM concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Dalton v. Akron Cent. Sch.
(Dec 10, 2013)