Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

In re PENSION CASES.

Carly Beauvais Iafrate, Esq.

Andrew S. Tugan, Esq.

Andrew Henneous, Esq.

Raymond A. Marcaccio, Esq.

Samuel D. Zurier, Esq.

Kelly A. McElroy, Esq.

Jon M. Anderson, Esq.

William M. Dolan, Esq.

Gerald John Petros, Esq.

Peter D. Ruggiero, Esq.

Timothy C. Cavazza, Esq.

John A. Tarantino, Esq.

Vincent F. Ragosta, Jr., Esq.

William J. Conley, Jr., Esq.

David M. D'Agostino, Esq.

Rebecca T. Partington, Esq.

Andrew A. Thomas, Esq.

Patricia K. Rocha, Esq.

Nicole J. Benjamin, Esq.

Albert B. West, Esq.

Marc DeSisto, Esq.

Gary T. Gentile, Esq.

Elizabeth A. Wiens, Esq.

Thomas R. Landry, Esq.

Lynette J. Labinger, Esq.

Donna Burke, Esq.

Mathew T. Oliverio, Esq.

Brian Laplante, Esq.

Joseph Avanzato, Esq.

Joseph F. Penza, Jr., Esq.

Sean T. O'Leary, Esq.

Steven B. Merolla, Esq.

Matthew Jerzyk, Esq.

Steven M. Robinson, Esq.

Gregory P. Piccirilli, Esq.

Diana E. Pearson, Esq.

Arthur G. Capaldi, Esq.

Stephen Adams, Esq.

D. Peter Desimone, Esq.

Erica Pistorino, Esq.

ORDER

These matters came before a single justice of this Court, sitting as duty justice, on the petitions for the issuance of a writ of certiorari filed on behalf of the petitioners, Rhode Island Public Employees' Retirement Coalition et al., in PC 2012–3166. In their petitions, the petitioners seek review of the bench decision of the trial justice denying their motion for a continuance and to vacate a trial date of April 20, 2015. The petitioners also ask this Court to stay the decision of the trial justice pending review of their petitions for issuance of a writ of certiorari.

The petitioners in the other so-called pension cases have joined in or expressed support for the petitions. The respondents in the various pension cases have also filed memoranda with this Court supporting the request for review of the trial justice's decision and request for stay.

The duty justice has reviewed the documents submitted by the parties, has conferred with the parties, and with the other members of the Court. The Supreme

Court, after reviewing these matters, issues the following order:

1. These matters are hereby consolidated.

2. The petitions for the issuance of a writ of certiorari are denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In re Pension Cases
(Mar 5, 2015)