Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Dawn STEWART, Appellant, v. DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY, Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.
Dawn Stewart, Appellant Pro Se, for appellant. Ninion S. Riley, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Division Two: VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., and ALOK AHUJA and GARY D. WITT, JJ.


ORDER


PER CURIAM:


Dawn Stewart appeals an order issued by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, which found her ineligible for unemployment benefits from August 5, 2012, through October 6, 2012, because she was unavailable for work. § 288.040.1(2), RSMo. Stewart argues that the Commission's ruling was not supported by competent and substantial evidence. We disagree, and affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Stewart v. Div. of Emp't Sec.
(Jun 3, 2014)