Robert E. Payne
ORDERHaving reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE entered herein on June 2, 2011 (Docket No. 11), the plaintiff's objections thereto (Docket No. 12) , the defendant's response to plaintiff's objections (Docket No. 14) and having considered the record and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE and finding no error therein, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1) The plaintiff's objections are overruled;
(2) The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Docket No. 11) is ADOPTED on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION;
(3) The plaintiff's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR REMAND (Docket Nos. 7 and 8) is denied;
(4) The DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 10) is granted; and
(5) The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
The issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process.
It is so ORDERED.
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia
Date: October 1 , 2011
Comments