Alan M. Mansfield, Esquire, The Consumer Law Group San Diego, CA, Michael A. Bowse, Esquire, Browne George Ross LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs–Appellees. Molly Moriarty Lane, Esquire, Thomas M. Peterson, Morgan Lewis & Bockius, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Benjamin J. Fox, Esquire, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Kent A. Halkett, Esquire, Musick Peeler & Garrett, LLP, Jason Levin, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Robert F. Scoular, Dentons U.S. LLP, J. Kevin Snyder, Esquire, Dykema Gossett LLP, Brett Linden McClure, Esquire, Margaret Anne Grignon, Esquire Reed Smith LLP, Matthew Oster, McDermott Will & Emery, Neil R. O'Hanlon, Esquire, Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Michael I. Katz, Esquire, Thomas Whitelaw & Tyler LLP, Irvine, CA, Martin D. Schneiderman, Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Washington, DC, Thomas Makris, Brian D. Martin, Esquire, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Sacramento, CA, Mark L. Brown, Esquire, Rachel Milazzo, Esquire, Stephen M. O'Brien, III, Esquire, Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal LLP, St. Louis, MO, Marina N. Vitek, Roxborough, Pomerance, Nye & Adreani, Woodland Hills, CA, Sean M. Sherlock, Esquire, Snell & Wilmer LLP, Costa Mesa, CA, Robert Arthur Muhlbach, Kirtland & Packard LLP, El Segundo, CA, for Defendants–Appellants.
Before: ALEX KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, HARRY PREGERSON, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, KIM McLANE WARDLAW, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, RONALD M. GOULD, MARSHA S. BERZON, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The case is remanded to the three judge panel for consideration in light of the California Supreme Court's opinion in Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC, 58 Cal.4th 329, 165 Cal.Rptr.3d 800, 315 P.3d 71 (2013). The prior panel opinion, 652 F.3d 1085 (9th Cir.2011), is vacated.