AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MICHAEL CELESTINE v. MARLIN N. GUSMAN, SHERIFF

SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER AND REASONS

Pro se litigant Michael Celestine filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action, complaining about the conditions of his confinement. The Magistrate Judge recommends that Celestine's complaint be dismissed. Celestine did not file objections to the Magistrate Judge's findings. Having reviewed de novo the complaint, the record, the applicable law, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (R&R), the Court approves the R&R and adopts it as its opinion.

R. Doc. 1.

R. Doc. 10. --------

New Orleans, Louisiana, this 1st day of December, 2015.

/s/_________


SARAH S. VANCE


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Celestine v. Gusman
(Dec 1, 2015)