AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

LESLIE L. DEGEN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE GOVERNMENT'S EX PARTE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The government's response to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in this social security appeal was due on November 30. On November 30, the government filed an ex parte motion seeking a thirty-day extension, due to "pre-approved leave as well as a heavy workload" (Dkt. No. 12).

The briefing schedule for social security appeals is set by Civil L.R. 16-5. The government has known about this deadline for four weeks and could have approximated it when it answered the complaint on October 5. There is no good cause for this massive extension. The government should have sought a more reasonable extension long before the deadline.

The government's brief shall be due by DECEMBER 11 AT NOON. Plaintiff's reply shall be due within fourteen days of service of the government's opposition or counter-motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2015.

/s/_________


WILLIAM ALSUP


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Degen v. Colvin
(Dec 1, 2015)