AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ISIAH DANIELS, Petitioner, v. KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden,1 Respondent.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis, in this habeas corpus action filed on June 22, 2011, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the petition (Dkt. No. 18), and petitioner has filed an opposition thereto (Dkt. No. 19). Review of the parties briefing indicates that respondent has moved to dismiss the petition based only an argument pertaining to "Marsy's Law;" respondent's motion does not address petitioner's substantive challenge to the June 9, 2009 decision of the California Board of Parole Hearings ("Board"), denying petitioner parole.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within fourteen days after the filing date of this order, respondent shall file and serve a supplemental brief that substantively addresses petitioner's challenge to the June 9, 2009 decision of the Board, denying petitioner parole.

2. Petitioner may, within fourteen days after service of respondent's supplemental brief, file and serve a response thereto.

SO ORDERED.

____________________


KENDALL J. NEWMAN


UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Daniels v. Chappell
(Jun 1, 2012)