Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Kurtis Ray MINCH, Defendant–Appellee.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 20, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). We further order the Muskegon Circuit Court, in accordance with Administrative Order 2003–03, to determine whether the defendant is indigent and, if so, to appoint Kevin J. Wistrom, if feasible, to represent the defendant in this Court. If this appointment is not feasible, the trial court shall, within the same time frame, appoint other counsel to represent the defendant in this Court. The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of the order appointing counsel, or a ruling that the defendant is not entitled to appointed counsel.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Minch
(Jun 1, 2012)