AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Rick CUSUMANO, Defendant/Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Supreme Court Denied Jan. 10, 2012.

Application for Transfer Denied March 6, 2012. Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 10SL–CR0041, Mark D. Seigel, Judge.Stephen A. Zarky, Clayton, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Timothy A. Blackwell, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent. Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., P.J., MARY K. HOFF, J. and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rick Cusumano (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030, RSMo 1986, and one count of forcible sodomy, in violation of Section 566.060, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment on both counts to be served concurrently. We affirm.

Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 1986.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). -------- Notes:

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Cusumano
(Nov 22, 2011)