AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE of State of New York, respondent, v. Philip FARRICE, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Anna Pervukhin of counsel), for appellant. Daniel M. Donovan, Jr., District Attorney, Staten Island, N.Y. (Morrie I. Kleinbart of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rienzi, J.), dated May 13, 2010, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sexually violent offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6–C.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly assessed the defendant 10 points under risk factor 12 for failing to genuinely accept responsibility, as required by the Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary. According to the presentence investigation report relied upon by the hearing court ( see People v. Mingo, 12 N.Y.3d 563, 571, 883 N.Y.S.2d 154, 910 N.E.2d 983;People v. James, 99 A.D.3d 775, 951 N.Y.S.2d 676), during an interview with the Probation Department, the defendant minimized the underlying sexual offense and, alternatively, denied that he performed the criminal sexual act which formed the basis for the conviction ( see People v. Perry, 85 A.D.3d 890, 925 N.Y.S.2d 345;see also People v. Vega, 79 A.D.3d 718, 719, 911 N.Y.S.2d 917). Accordingly, the defendant was properly designated a level three sexually violent offender.

FLORIO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Farrice
(Nov 28, 2012)