AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

CAROLINA INTERNET, LTD, Plaintiff, v. TW TELECOM HOLDINGS, INC, Defendant.

ORDER

GRAHAM MULLEN, District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Stay the Court's Transfer Order [D.I. 24] and Defendant's Response [D. I. 26]. On June 24, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Transfer Venue [D.I. 5]. This Court granted Defendant's Motion on July 25, 2011, after consideration of the Defendant's Motion, the Plaintiff's Response [D.I. 17], and the Defendant's Reply [D.I. 20]. It is this Court's practice to hold a case file for ten days after issuing an Order to Transfer before transferring a case to its new venue. The Court sees no reason why, after full briefing and a decision on the issue, the Transfer Order [D.I. 21] should be stayed. Therefore, the Plaintiff's Motion to stay is DENIED. Should Plaintiff wish to file a motion for reconsideration, it must be done within ten days of the Transfer Order. The deadline is August 4, 2011 at 12:00 p.m. If a motion for reconsideration is filed, the Court will retain the case until any pending motion for reconsideration is decided.

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion to Stay is DENIED. Further, the Transfer Order is AMENDED to correct a typographical error and transfer this case to the District of Colorado, not the Western District of Colorado.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CAROLINA INTERNET, LTD v. TW TELECOM HOLDINGS, INC (W.D.N.C. 8-1-2011)
(Aug 1, 2011)