Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles KYLES, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Julian Bush, Judge.
Roxanna Mason, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, J. and ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, J.


ORDER


PER CURIAM.


Charles Kyles (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of his conviction by a jury of tampering with a motor vehicle in the first degree, a class C felony, Section 569.080 RSMo. (Cum.Supp.2005) , resisting arrest or interfering with arrest, a class D felony, Section 575.150 RSMo. (Cum.Supp.2009), and assault on a law enforcement officer in the third degree, a class A misdemeanor, Section 565.083. On appeal, Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction for felony resisting arrest.

All further statutory references will be to RSMo. (Cum.Supp.2005), unless otherwise indicated.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. We find the evidence was sufficient to support Appellant's conviction for felony resisting arrest. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b) Mo.R.Crim. P. (2012).
-------- Notes:

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Kyles
(Oct 2, 2012)