Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ignacio PENA, Defendant–Appellant.

MAZZARELLI


Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Robert S. Dean of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Julia L. Chariott of counsel), for respondent.
MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, ACOSTA, CLARK, KAPNICK, JJ.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alvin Yearwood, J.), rendered March 16, 2012, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second and third degrees, reckless endangerment in the second degree, unlawful fleeing a police officer in a motor vehicle in the third degree, and operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of six years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 348–349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 [2007] ). While an officer was lawfully attempting to remove defendant from a car, defendant drove forward rapidly, with the officer still hanging on to defendant, causing the officer to be dragged and injured. The totality of defendant's conduct throughout the incident supports the conclusion that defendant acted with intent to prevent the officer from performing a lawful duty ( seePenal Law § 120.05[3]; People v. Bueno, 18 N.Y.3d 160, 168–169, 936 N.Y.S.2d 636, 960 N.E.2d 405 [2011] ), and that defendant was not so intoxicated as to be unable to form the requisite intent ( seePenal Law § 15.25; People v. Stillwagon, 101 A.D.3d 1629, 956 N.Y.S.2d 352 [4th Dept.2012], lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 1020, 971 N.Y.S.2d 502, 994 N.E.2d 398 [2013] ).

Defendant's excessive sentence claim appears to be moot because he has completed his prison term and, as a result of having been deported, he is not serving postrelease supervision. In any event, we perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Pena
(Jun 23, 2015)