AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BAYER CROPSCIENCE AG AND BAYER S.A.S., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC, Defendant-Appellee.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:12-cv-00256-RMB-JS, Judge Renee Marie Bumb.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER J. GASPAR, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were ROBERT J. KOCH, STEPHANIE R. AMOROSO, EDWARD J. MAYLE and RONALD L. SIGWORTH, of Washington, DC. Of counsel on the brief were BRADFORD J. BADKE and SONA DE, Ropes & Gray LLP, of New York, New York. MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were SUSANNAH LANDES WEAVER; and PETER A. BICKS, ALEX V. CHACHKES and ANDREW D. SILVERMAN, of New York, New York. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PLAGER, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 17, 2014


Date


/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole


Daniel E. O'Toole


Clerk of Court


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Bayer Cropscience AG v. Dow Agrosciences LLC
(Oct 17, 2014)