Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GEORGE R. GREEN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Defendant.

LORETTA A. PRESKA

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

LORETTA A. PRESKA, Chief United States District Judge:

Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to seek review of the Social Security Administration denying his application for disability insurance benefits. The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). On April 24, 2012, Magistrate Judge Maas issued an exhaustive Report and Recommendation, concluding that the Commissioner's motion should be granted in part and denied in part. To date, the Court has received no objections from either party.

Having found Judge Maas's analysis to be correct and appropriate upon de novo review, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted. Accordingly, the Commissioner's motion [dkt. no. 8] is granted in part and denied in part. The case is remanded solely to develop the record below and resolve the apparently inconsistent findings with respect to Plaintiff's residual functional capacity ("RFC") and the availability of jobs consistent with that RFC.

The Clerk of the Court shall mark this action closed and all pending motions denied as moot. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter, however, for the purpose of any appeal from further findings by the Administrative Law Judge. SO ORDERED.

__________________


LORETTA A. PRESKA


Chief U.S. District Judge


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Green v. Astrue
(Jul 25, 2012)