Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PAUL SMITH, Plaintiff, v. DONALD UHLER, LIEUTENANT ANCTEL, L. STICKNEY, Defendants.

DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge

APPEARANCES: PAUL SMITH 00-A-2268
Plaintiff, pro se
Five Points Correctional Facility, Caller Box 119
Romulus, New York 14541
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
Office of the Attorney General - Albany
Counsel for Respondent
The Capitol
Albany, New York 12224
OF COUNSEL: CHRISTOPHER W. HALL, ESQ. DAVID N. HURD United States District Judge DECISION and ORDER








Pro se plaintiff Paul Smith filed this action on July 18, 2012. On June 24, 2015, the Honorable Thérèse Wiley Dancks, United States Magistrate Judge, advised by Report-Recommendation that defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 be granted. No objections to the Report-Recommendation were filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendant's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 56) is GRANTED with prejudice;

2. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY; and

3. The Clerk serve a copy of this Decision and Order upon plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________


United States District Judge
Dated: September 24, 2015


Utica, New York.


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Smith v. Uhler
(Sep 24, 2015)