Amy Totenberg
ORDER
This criminal action is before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. n], the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") recommending that the motion be denied [Doc. 32], and Defendant's Objections to the R&R [Doc. 39].
Based on the comprehensive nature of Defendant's objections, the Court has reviewed Defendant's Motion to Suppress on a de novo basis. After conducting a de novo review of the record and briefs filed, the Court finds that the motion should be denied based on the reasoning and legal analysis articulated in the Magistrate Judge's thorough R&R. Accordingly, the Court OVERRULES the Defendant's Objections, ADOPTS the R&R [Doc. 32], and DENIES Defendant's Motion to Suppress [Doc. 11].
It is so ORDERED this 4th day of September, 2012.
____________
Amy Totenberg
United Spates District Judge