AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BARRY DILLER, Plaintiff, v. BARRY DRILLER CONTENT SYSTEMS PLC; BARRY DRILLER, INC.; AEREOKILLER, LLC; FILMON.COM, INC.; ALKIVIADES DAVID, A/K/A ALKI DAVID, an indi

AUDREY B. COLLINS

ROBERT H. PLATT (Bar No. CA 108533)
MARK S. LEE (Bar No. CA 094103)
SETH REAGAN (Bar No. CA 279368)
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS, LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
BARRY DILLER






[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Place: Courtroom of the Hon. Audrey B. Collins
ORDER

Plaintiff Barry Diller's application for preliminary injunction ("Plaintiff's Application") against Defendants Barry Driller Content Systems Plc, Barry Driller, Inc., Aereokiller, LLC, FilmOn.com, Inc., Alkiviades David, a/k/a Alki David, and Does 1-10 (collectively "Defendants") came on regularly for hearing before this Court on September 10, 2012. Robert H. Platt and Mark S. Lee of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Ryan G. Baker and Christian A. Anstett of Baker Marquart LLP appeared on behalf of Defendants Alkiviades David, Aereokiller, LLC, and FilmOn.com, Inc.

The Court having considered Plaintiff's Application, the papers submitted in support of and in opposition thereto, the oral arguments of all parties at the hearing, and all other relevant records in this case, and finding good cause, Plaintiff's Application is HEREBY GRANTED for the reasons stated in the Court's Tentative Order issued on September 10, 2012. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

Defendants, and each of them, as well as their past, present, and future subsidiary, successor, affiliated or related companies, as well as their respective officers, directors, members, partners, principals, agents, representatives, shareholders, investors, employees, successors and assigns, including any websites such entities or individuals own or control, and any and all others acting in active concert or participation with them, at their direction, or on their behalf in any capacity, are hereby PRELIMINARILY ENJOINED while this action is pending from using the terms "Barry Diller," "Barry Driller," "BarryDriller.com," "Barry Driller, Inc.," "BarryDriller Content Systems Plc.," any confusingly similar variant of the foregoing, or any other aspect of the trademarks, name, voice, likeness, or other indicia of identity of Plaintiff Barry Diller (i) in connection with the operation of Defendants' or any other commercial websites, (ii) to divert internet users to Defendants' or any other websites, (iii) to promote Defendants' businesses, or (iv) in any other manner to infringe on Plaintiff's trademarks, rights of publicity, or other rights.

The bond previously posted by Plaintiff and filed with this Court on August 29, 2012 shall remain in effect for the duration of this action as security for payment of such costs and damages, if any, as may be incurred or suffered by any party who is subsequently found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained hereby. IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________


AUDREY B. COLLINS


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Presented By:
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Diller v. Barry Driller Content Sys. PLC
(Sep 19, 2012)