Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Howard Wesley COTTERMAN, Defendant–Appellee.

KOZINSKI

Carmen F. Corbin, Assistant U.S. Attorney, USTU–Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff–Appellant. William J. Kirchner, Nash & Kirchner, P.C., Tucson, AZ, for Defendant–Appellee. David Miles Porter, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDCA–Federal Public Defender's Office, Sacramento, CA, Christopher Todd Handman, Hogan Lovells U.S. LLP, Washington, DC, for Amicus Curiae.D.C. No. 4:07–cr–01207–RCC–CRP–1.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Cotterman
(Mar 19, 2012)