AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

MAGPUL INDUSTRIES CORP., Plaintiff, v. TONG ZEJUN, et al., Defendants.

JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation ("Report") prepared by Magistrate Judge Vadas (ECF No. 72), in which he recommends that the Court grant Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (ECF No. 63), and enter judgment against Defendant Tong as follows:

Tong, and those acting at his direction, be forever enjoined from: (1) using Magpul's trademarks in connection with the sale of any unauthorized goods; (2) infringing upon the Magpul Marks; (3) unfairly competing with Magpul; (4) falsely representing themselves as being connected with Magpul; (5) using any reproduction, counterfeit, copy or colorable imitation of Magpul's trademarks in connection with publicity, promotion, or sale of goods, and; (6) affixing, applying, annexing, or using in connection with the sale of any goods, a false description or representation that describe or represent such goods as being those of Magpul; and $120,000.00 in monetary damages.

(ECF No. 72 at 13.)

The deadline for filing objections to the Report has passed, and neither party has filed objections. The Court has considered the Report, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case. The Court finds the Report thorough and well reasoned and adopts it in every respect. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for default judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 16, 2014

/s/_________


JEFFREY S. WHITE


UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Magpul Indus. Corp. v. Zejun
(Dec 16, 2014)