AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BLINDS TO GO (U.S.), INC., respondent, v. TIMES PLAZA DEVELOPMENT, L.P., appellant.

Kenneth J. Glassman, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Westerman Ball Ederer Miller & Sharfstein, LLP, Uniondale, N.Y. (Richard Gabriele of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for breach of a lease, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated November 28, 2012, which denied its motion for leave to amend its answer.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for leave to amend its answer to assert additional affirmative defenses and counterclaims, as they were either palpably insufficient or patently devoid of merit ( see T & V. Constr., Inc. v. Calapai, 90 A.D.3d 908, 909, 935 N.Y.S.2d 68; G.K. Alan Assoc., Inc. v. Lazzari, 44 A.D.3d 95, 99, 840 N.Y.S.2d 378, affd.10 N.Y.3d 941, 862 N.Y.S.2d 855, 893 N.E.2d 133).

RIVERA, J.P., SKELOS, CHAMBERS and HALL, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Blinds to Go (U.S.), Inc. v. Times Plaza Dev., L.P.
(Nov 20, 2013)