Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DAVID W. TUYTJENS

DOUGLAS E. ARPERT

Hon. Douglas E. Arpert
ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE

This matter having come before the Court on the joint application of Paul J. Fishman, United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey (John E. Gabby, Assistant U.S. Attorney, appearing), and defendant David W. Tuytjens (Brian Reilly, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Esq., appearing), for an order granting a continuance of the proceedings in the above-captioned matter for a period of 45 days to permit defense counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation in this matter and to allow the parties to conduct plea negotiations and attempt to finalize a plea agreement, the parties having sought no prior continuances, and the defendant being aware that the defendant has the right to have the matter submitted to a grand jury within thirty days of the date of the defendant's initial appearance on the complaint, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(b), and the defendant having consented to the continuance and waived such right, and for good cause shown,

IT IS THE FINDING OF THIS COURT that this action should be continued for the following reasons:

(1) Taking into account the exercise of diligence, the facts of this case require that defense counsel be permitted a reasonable amount of additional time for effective preparation and investigation of this matter;

(2) Plea negotiations are currently in progress, and both the United States and the defendant desire additional time to negotiate a plea agreement, which would render any grand jury proceedings and any subsequent trial of this matter unnecessary;

(3) The United States intends to prepare and to provide certain pre-indictment discovery, which might render any grand jury proceedings and indictment unnecessary;

(4) As a result of the foregoing, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7), the ends of justice served by granting the continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS, therefore, on this 2ed day of July 2012,

ORDERED that this action be, and hereby is, continued for a period of 45 days from July 3, 2012, to August 16, 2012; and it is further

ORDERED that the period from July 3, 2012, through August 16, 2012 shall be excludable in computing time under the Speedy Trial Act of 1974.

_______________


HON. DOUGLAS E. ARPERT


United States Magistrate Judge
Form and entry consented to:

_______________


JOHN E. CLABBY


Assistant U.S. Attorney


_______________


BRIAN REILLY


Counsel for defendant David W. Tuytjens


Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

United States v. Tuytjens
(Jul 2, 2012)