AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., respondent, v. Inez BARON, appellant.

Inez Baron, Lido Beach, N.Y., appellant pro se.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Parga, J.), dated March 8, 2012, which denied her motion to vacate a prior order of the same court entered November 22, 2011, granting the plaintiff's unopposed motion for summary judgment.

ORDERED that the order dated March 8, 2012, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In order to vacate her default in opposing the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the defendant was required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for her default and a potentially meritorious defense ( see Donovan v. Chiapetta, 72 A.D.3d 635, 897 N.Y.S.2d 908;Aurora Loan Servs. v. Grant, 70 A.D.3d 986, 893 N.Y.S.2d 898;Political Mktg., Int'l, Inc. v. Jaliman, 67 A.D.3d 661, 888 N.Y.S.2d 552). Here, the defendant failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for her default or the existence of a potentially meritorious defense. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly denied her motion.

DICKERSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Baron
(Mar 26, 2014)