Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Carlos ABREU, Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (David J. Klem of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (Timothy C. Stone of counsel), for respondent.
MEMORANDUM:


The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant Carlos Abreu completed the offense of second-degree weapon possession, with the requisite intent, before committing the act constituting first-degree felony murder. Accordingly, the sentences for those crimes could be run consecutively ( see People v. Salcedo, 92 N.Y.2d 1019, 1020–1021, 684 N.Y.S.2d 480, 707 N.E.2d 435 [1998] ). Additionally, the alleged evidentiary errors could not have affected the verdict in light of the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt and, thus, any such error would be harmless. Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur. Judge RIVERA took no part.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

People v. Abreu
(Feb 14, 2013)