AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Judges

In the Matter of Anthony RUSSO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF PAROLE, Respondent.

Anthony Russo, Comstock, appellant pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M. Arnold of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered March 9, 2011 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a September 2009 determination of the Board of Parole denying his request for parole release. Petitioner, however, has reappeared before the Board and the appeal is now moot ( see Matter of Davidson v. Alexander, 67 A.D.3d 1219, 1219, 888 N.Y.S.2d 449 [2009]; Matter of Bermudez v. New York State Div. of Parole, 281 A.D.2d 673, 720 N.Y.S.2d 856 [2001] ). Accordingly, it must be dismissed.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

ROSE, J.P., KAVANAGH, STEIN, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

In the Matter of Anthony Russo v. N.Y. State Div. of Parole
(Nov 17, 2011)