Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

Mar v. n Kenneth SHUE, Appellant (Defendant),

Order Affirming the Judgment and Sentence of the District Court

[¶ 1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Appellant pled guilty to one count of sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree. This is Appellant's direct appeal from that conviction. On March 5, 2012, Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel filed a “Motion to Withdraw as Counsel,” pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Following a careful review of the record and the “Anders brief” submitted by counsel, this Court, on March 27, 2012, entered its “Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw.” That Order notified Appellant that the District Court's June 2, 2011 “Judgment and Sentence” would be affirmed unless, on or before May 11, 2012, Appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court that the captioned appeal is not wholly frivolous. Taking note that Appellant, Marvin Kenneth Shue, has not filed a brief or other pleading within the time allotted, the Court finds that the district court's “Judgment and Sentence” should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶ 2] ORDERED that the District Court's June 2, 2011 “Judgment and Sentence” be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶ 3] DATED this 24th day of May, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ MARILYN S. KITE

Chief Justice

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

Shue v. State
(May 24, 2012)