Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Edward TRAMBLE, Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Thomas J. Frawley, Judge.Brocca Smith, St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Jennifer A. Wideman, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent. Before CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, P.J., ROY L. RICHTER, and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Edward Tramble (Defendant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered after a jury convicted him of one count of second-degree burglary, a felony, (Count I), one count of stealing, a misdemeanor (Count II), and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to use, a misdemeanor (Count III). Defendant contends that the trial court erred when it denied his motion for acquittal and imposed judgment on Count I because there was insufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that Defendant entered the building with the intent to commit a crime.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The commission's decision is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

State v. Tramble
(Feb 21, 2012)